What did Congress do on March 10th, 2025?
fresh off the presses - by watchdog.fyi
Here's what Congress did today:
Rep. David Kustoff (R-TN) introduced bill H.Con.Res. 17 to authorize the use of Emancipation Hall for a ceremony commemorating the victims of the Holocaust.
Summary:
Congress Unites to Honor Holocaust Victims in Emancipation Hall
In a rare display of bipartisan unity, Congress has come together to commemorate Holocaust Remembrance Day with a ceremony in Emancipation Hall. This event, scheduled for April 23, 2025, highlights the importance of remembrance and unity in today's politically charged climate.
A Bipartisan Effort
Rep. David Kustoff (R-TN) introduced bill H.Con.Res. 17 to authorize the use of Emancipation Hall for this solemn occasion. The bill has garnered support from both sides of the aisle, with 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans lending their backing, underscoring the non-partisan nature of this cause.
Preparations and Significance
The ceremony will be meticulously prepared under the guidance of the Architect of the Capitol, ensuring that Emancipation Hall is ready to host this meaningful event. This effort not only honors the victims of the Holocaust but also serves as a reminder of the importance of unity and collective remembrance.
Takeaway
In a time of political division, this bipartisan initiative stands out as a beacon of cooperation. The ceremony in Emancipation Hall is more than just an event; it's a testament to the enduring importance of remembering history and standing together in respect and solidarity.
Legislative Status: The concurrent resolution has been agreed to in the House and now needs to be considered by the Senate. Next, the Senate will review and vote on the resolution.
Links: HTML
Rep. J. Luis Correa (D-CA-46) introduced bill H.R. 993 to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a plan to identify, integrate, and deploy new technologies to enhance border security capabilities
Summary:
If Congress can't modernize border security...
While many eyes are on the latest developments in technology and policy, a new bill introduced by Rep. J. Luis Correa (D-CA-46) is signaling a significant shift in how Congress approaches border security. The bill, H.R. 993, mandates the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a comprehensive plan within 180 days to integrate new technologies that enhance border security capabilities.
The Development
This bill isn't just about upgrading systems; it's about creating a strategic roadmap. The plan will assess existing technologies used by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other federal agencies, propose new programs, and critically evaluate the privacy and security implications of these technologies. Additionally, it requires annual progress reports to ensure accountability and transparency.
The Implications
This initiative reflects a broader effort to modernize border security, balancing innovation with privacy concerns. It's not just about technology; it's about addressing future challenges proactively. As this bill moves through Congress, it will be a key indicator of how lawmakers are approaching the integration of technology into national security strategies.
The Takeaway
Keep a close eye on H.R. 993. It's more than a bill; it's a glimpse into how Congress is navigating the complex landscape of security and innovation. This could set a precedent for future policies, making it a crucial piece of legislation to monitor.
Legislative Status: The bill has passed the House and is now moving to the Senate for a vote.
Links: HTML
Rep. Dale W. Strong (R-AL-5) introduced bill H.R. 901 to require a department-wide policy for safeguarding research and development from unauthorized access or disclosure of sensitive information.
Summary:
Can Rep. Dale Strong's New Bill Safeguard R&D from Unauthorized Access?
In a move to address the growing concern over protecting sensitive information, Rep. Dale W. Strong (R-AL-5) has introduced a bill aimed at enhancing security around research and development projects. As the importance of safeguarding R&D grows, this bill could set a new standard for how such projects are secured.
Department-Wide Policy Required: The bill mandates the Under Secretary of the Science and Technology Directorate to develop a comprehensive policy to protect R&D from unauthorized access or disclosure.
Reporting to Congress: It requires a report to Congress on compliance with national security memoranda and technology guidelines, as well as the department's role in establishing a research security framework.
Political Sponsorship: Sponsored by Rep. Dale Strong with Republican support, the bill currently has no Democratic or Independent backing.
The Takeaway
Rep. Strong's bill highlights the critical need for robust security measures in R&D. If passed, it could significantly impact how sensitive information is handled, potentially strengthening national security and research integrity. This move underscores the ongoing efforts to protect intellectual assets in an increasingly competitive landscape.
Stay informed as this bill progresses through Congress.
Legislative Status: The bill has passed the House after a successful floor vote and is now moving to the Senate for their consideration and vote.
Links: HTML
Rep. Elijah Crane (R-AZ) introduced bill H.R. 495 to require annual reports on counter illicit cross-border tunnel operations
Summary:
If Rep. Elijah Crane’s new bill passes, it could reshape border security efforts...
In a move that’s gaining attention, Rep. Elijah Crane (R-AZ) has introduced the Subterranean Border Defense Act, H.R. 495, aiming to enhance annual reports on counter-illicit cross-border tunnel operations. This bill isn’t just another piece of legislation; it’s a significant step in bolstering border security through transparency and strategic planning.
The bill proposes expanding existing requirements for annual reports, adding a layer of accountability to the development of strategic plans. While tunnel operations have long been a concern, this legislation emphasizes the need for consistent oversight, ensuring that efforts to combat illicit activities remain a priority.
Although the bill is sponsored mainly by Republican lawmakers, its implications extend beyond party lines. It reflects a growing bipartisan interest in addressing border security issues, even if the approaches may differ. This isn’t the first time such measures have been proposed, but the annual reporting requirement signals a proactive approach, aiming to stay ahead of evolving threats.
The potential impact is substantial. Enhanced reporting could lead to more effective strategies, better allocation of resources, and improved international cooperation. However, it also raises questions about the practicality of implementing such measures and the potential challenges in enforcing them.
The Takeaway
Rep. Crane’s bill is more than just a legislative proposal; it’s a reflection of broader trends in border security and governance. As the bill moves through Congress, it’s worth monitoring how it navigates the political landscape and what it signifies for future security strategies. This could be a pivotal moment in how we approach underground threats, making it a story worth keeping an eye on.
Legislative Status: The bill HR 495 has been passed by the House of Representatives after being debated and agreed upon. The next step is for it to go to the Senate for a floor vote.
Links: HTML
Sen. Cassidy (R-LA) introduced bill S_331 to schedule fentanyl-related substances and require research registration
Summary:
If Congress can’t curb the fentanyl crisis...
The opioid crisis rages on, and lawmakers are under pressure to act. Enter Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), who has introduced a bill aimed at tackling the surge in fentanyl-related deaths. S.331 seeks to add fentanyl-related substances to Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, a move that could have significant implications for both law enforcement and medical research.
The bill, which has garnered bipartisan support, including 6 Democrats, 1 Independent, and 23 Republicans, isn’t just about scheduling. It also introduces stricter registration requirements for researchers working with Schedule I substances. This includes allowing expedited procedures for practitioners already registered in Schedule I or II, and a single registration for related research sites. Transparency is key here—researchers will need to disclose special procedures for studying these substances.
This isn’t the first time Congress has tried to address the opioid crisis, but the stakes have never been higher. Fentanyl overdoses continue to climb, and the need for both enforcement and medical solutions is urgent. While some argue that scheduling more substances could hinder research, others believe it’s a necessary step to curb illegal distribution.
The Takeaway
The opioid crisis isn’t going away, and this bill could be a crucial step in addressing it. But as with any drug scheduling, the balance between public safety and medical research will be key. Keep an eye on this one—it could shape the future of both law enforcement and addiction treatment.
Legislative Status: The Senate bill has been discussed and moved forward with several motions and votes. The next step is for the Senate to hold a floor vote on the bill.
Links: HTML
Rep. Troy A. Carter (D-LA) introduced bill H.R. 1374 to improve the Securing the Cities program by enhancing eligibility criteria and mandating oversight and reporting requirements.
Summary:
Will Rep. Troy A. Carter's Bill Strengthen National Security?
In a move that could reshape national security measures, Rep. Troy A. Carter (D-LA) has introduced a bill aimed at enhancing the Securing the Cities (STC) program. This initiative comes at a time when legislative actions are under scrutiny for their impact on national safety and preparedness.
Breaking It Down:
The bill, H.R. 1374, seeks to improve the STC program by revising its eligibility criteria. This change would allow jurisdictions to qualify based not only on their vulnerability to terrorist attacks but also on their preparedness and response capabilities. Additionally, the bill mandates the establishment of performance metrics and milestones, ensuring close monitoring of expenditures. A report on participation and performance is required two years post-enactment, promoting transparency and accountability.
The Takeaway:
Rep. Carter's bill signifies a proactive approach to national security, emphasizing preparedness and accountability. By expanding eligibility and enhancing oversight, the STC program could become more effective in addressing modern security challenges. This legislative effort reflects broader efforts to strengthen national resilience and adapt to evolving threats.
Conclusion:
As the bill progresses, its potential to enhance national security will be closely watched. Readers are encouraged to monitor its developments, as it may set a precedent for future legislative actions in national security. Stay informed on how this bill could shape the future of our national preparedness and response capabilities.
Legislative Status: The bill HR-1374 was introduced in the House, referred to committees, and passed after debate and a voice vote. Next, it will go to the Senate for a floor vote.
Links: HTML
Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS-3) introduced bill H.R. 1692 to extend a research and development acquisition pilot program that focuses on secure and trustworthy technologies, including artificial intelligence, and reduces the minimum award amount for contracts.
Summary:
If the PATHS Act Becomes Law...
The PATHS Act, introduced by Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS-3), aims to extend a research and development pilot program focused on secure and trustworthy technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI). This bill not only pushes for the advancement of AI in national security but also introduces key changes that could shape future contracts and Congressional oversight.
Breaking It Down:
Program Extension: The PATHS Act extends the pilot program under the Homeland Security Act until September 30, 2028, ensuring continued focus on developing reliable AI technologies.
Congressional Oversight: The bill mandates that Congress be notified within 72 hours of any transaction authority used for AI technology, enhancing transparency and accountability.
Contract Accessibility: By reducing the minimum contract award to $1,000,000, the Act lowers barriers for smaller firms and innovators to participate in these critical projects.
Why It Matters:
The PATHS Act underscores the growing importance of AI in national security, emphasizing the need for secure technologies. The requirement for Congressional notification signals a shift towards tighter oversight, ensuring that AI developments align with strategic goals. The lower contract threshold could democratize participation, fostering innovation from a broader range of entities.
The Takeaway:
The PATHS Act represents a strategic move to bolster AI innovation while maintaining accountability. Its passage could significantly influence the future of national security technologies and set a precedent for Congressional involvement in AI advancements. As it stands, the bill's journey through Congress may face challenges given the lack of bipartisan support, making its progress worth monitoring.
Legislative Status: The bill was introduced in the House, sent to the Homeland Security Committee, and then moved to suspend the rules for a quick vote. After a debate, the vote was postponed because not enough members were present. Next, the House will try again to gather enough members for the vote.
Links: HTML
Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL-28) introduced bill H.R. 1166 to prohibit Homeland Security from purchasing certain foreign-made batteries
Summary:
Will New Restrictions on Foreign Batteries Reshape U.S. Security Policy?
A new bill introduced by Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL-28) is drawing attention in Washington, aiming to limit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from sourcing batteries from certain foreign manufacturers. H.R. 1166, set to take effect on October 1, 2027, would ban purchases from companies tied to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act and those designated as Chinese military entities.
While primarily backed by Republican lawmakers, the bill includes provisions for limited exemptions. DHS may bypass the restriction for research purposes or in cases where viable alternatives are unavailable. Additionally, the bill mandates a comprehensive report within 180 days of enactment, evaluating the policy's impact on DHS operations and expenses.
This legislation underscores the growing focus on securing U.S. supply chains and reducing reliance on foreign adversaries for critical resources. The move reflects broader geopolitical concerns, particularly regarding economic security and ethical sourcing practices.
The Takeaway:
H.R. 1166 highlights a strategic shift in national security policy, prioritizing domestic resilience over cost efficiency. As the debate unfolds, the bill could shape future procurement policies and influence broader discussions on economic independence and national defense.
Legislative Status: The bill has passed the House and now moves to the Senate for a floor vote.
Links: HTML
Rep. Dale W. Strong (R-AL-5) introduced bill H.R. 708 to establish a working group in the Department of Homeland Security to counter threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party
Summary:
SHIELD Act: A New Front in Countering Chinese Security Threats
Rep. Dale W. Strong (R-AL-5) has introduced the SHIELD Act, a bill designed to establish a working group within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to address security threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party.
Key Points:
The working group will report directly to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
It will operate for seven years, submitting annual assessments of threats and reviewing existing programs to enhance security measures.
Political Context:
The bill has garnered support from 7 Republicans and 1 Democrat, indicating a primarily Republican initiative with some bipartisan backing.
Implications:
This legislation underscores a growing focus on countering security threats from China, potentially leading to enhanced security measures and policy changes.
The Takeaway:
The SHIELD Act represents a proactive congressional effort to address Chinese security threats, reflecting broader tensions in US-China relations.
Legislative Status: The bill HR-708 has passed the House after being debated and agreed upon by voice vote. The next step is for the bill to go to the Senate for a floor vote.
Links: HTML
Rep. Timothy M. Kennedy (D-NY) introduced bill H.R. 862 to study treating TSA employee commuting time as on-duty hours
Summary:
TSA Employees’ Commuting Time Might Soon Count as Work Hours
A new bill introduced by Rep. Timothy M. Kennedy (D-NY) could change how TSA employees' commuting time is classified. H.R. 862, known as the TSA Commuting Fairness Act, aims to study whether the time employees spend traveling between airports and parking lots should be considered on-duty hours.
The study will be completed within 270 days and will evaluate factors such as travel times, employee commutes, benefits of on-duty status, technical feasibility, and cost implications, including retirement benefits. This could significantly impact TSA employees' work-life balance and compensation.
The bill has garnered support from both parties, with 5 Democrats and 3 Republicans backing it, showing bipartisan interest in addressing this issue.
The Takeaway:
This bill highlights the ongoing efforts to improve working conditions for TSA employees. If passed, it could set a precedent for other industries to reevaluate commuting time policies, potentially influencing labor laws nationwide.
Legislative Status: The bill was introduced in the House, discussed in a committee, and passed by the House. Next, it goes to the Senate for a vote.
Links: HTML
Rep. Dale W. Strong (R-AL-5) introduced bill H.R. 706 to improve DHS biodetection functions by utilizing DOE laboratories and sites for research and development.
Summary:
Is DHS Falling Behind on Biodetection Technology?
With biological threats becoming an increasing concern, Congress is looking for ways to modernize detection capabilities. Rep. Dale W. Strong (R-AL-5) has introduced H.R. 706, a bill designed to overhaul how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) approaches biodetection by tapping into the expertise of the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratories. This move signals a shift toward greater interagency cooperation in national security efforts.
The Context:
The DHS Biodetection Improvement Act proposes a multi-faceted approach to strengthen biodetection. It mandates an assessment of past efforts, develops a strategic plan for future research, and requires periodic evaluations to identify and address gaps in technology. This comprehensive strategy aims to ensure the nation is better equipped to detect and respond to biological threats.
The Implications:
While the bill is currently sponsored by a Republican, its focus on national security could attract bipartisan support. The integration of DOE's cutting-edge labs signals a potential paradigm shift in how government agencies collaborate on critical security issues. This could set a precedent for future interagency R&D projects, driving innovation and efficiency.
The Takeaway:
H.R. 706 is more than just a bill; it's a strategic move to fortify national security through scientific advancement. As it navigates the legislative process, this initiative deserves attention for its potential to enhance our defense mechanisms and foster a new era of government collaboration.
Legislative Status: The bill HR-706 was introduced in the House, sent to committees for review, and then brought to the House floor for debate. Next, the House will vote on whether to pass the bill under the suspended rules.
Links: HTML
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-3) introduced bill H.R. 1974 to extend funding provisions through April 11, 2025
Summary:
Will Congress Extend Critical Funding for Healthcare, Disaster Relief, and Defense?
The fate of critical funding for healthcare, disaster relief, and naval shipbuilding hangs in the balance as Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-3) pushes to extend provisions through April 11, 2025. This funding isn’t just another appropriations measure—it’s a lifeline for hospitals, disaster-stricken communities, and the U.S. Navy’s shipbuilding ambitions. The bill also tweaks hospital payment structures, expands telehealth services, and allocates funds for big-ticket items like the Columbia Class Submarine. Oh, and there’s $750 million for disaster relief and a curious $174,000 for a congressional representative’s beneficiary. Why should you care? If this funding stalls, it could signal broader dysfunction in Congress—just as lawmakers are gearing up for bigger fights over spending and priorities.
The Takeaway:
This funding package is more than numbers on a page—it’s a test of Congress’s ability to keep the lights on for critical programs. Keep an eye on this one.
Legislative Status: The bill was introduced in the House and sent to two committees for review. The next step is for these committees to discuss and examine the bill.
Links: HTML
Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) introduced bill H.J. Res. 76 to disapprove the EPA's updates to new chemicals regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Summary:
A New Challenge to EPA’s Chemical Regulations
In a move that could have significant implications for environmental policy, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) has introduced a resolution to push back against the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) updated rules for new chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The bill, H.J. Res. 76, aims to disapprove the EPA’s amendments to its procedural regulations, which are designed to streamline the agency’s review processes and improve the quality of information submitted by manufacturers. The EPA’s updates would make certain chemicals, like PFAS and PBTs, categorically ineligible for exemptions, a change that could have major ramifications for industries that rely on these substances. However, Rep. Higgins and other supporters of the resolution argue that the new rules could overburden manufacturers and stifle innovation. The move reflects a broader tension between regulatory oversight and economic concerns.
The Takeaway
This legislative challenge highlights the ongoing debate over how to balance environmental protection with industrial growth. If successful, the resolution could slow or reverse the EPA’s efforts to strengthen chemical safety standards, setting a precedent for future regulatory battles.
Legislative Status: A joint resolution was introduced in the House and sent to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce for review. The next step is for the committee to discuss and vote on the resolution.
Links: HTML
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA-7) introduced H.Con. Res. 18 to recognize March 10, 2025, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day"
Summary:
A New Resolution Sparks Debate Over Abortion Rights
In a move that’s sure to reignite the national conversation on reproductive rights, Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA-7) has introduced H.Con.Res.18 to designate March 10, 2025, as 'Abortion Provider Appreciation Day.' The resolution aims to honor healthcare providers delivering essential abortion care despite growing restrictions, while also condemning the landmark Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. The bill, which has garnered support from 10 Democratic co-sponsors, emphasizes Congress’s commitment to protecting provider safety and ensuring access to care. It also highlights the fallout from the Dobbs ruling, including clinic closures and rising costs for patients. While the resolution is unlikely to pass in the current political climate, it serves as a symbolic statement of support for abortion rights at a time when the issue remains deeply divisive. The lack of bipartisan backing—no Republicans or Independents have endorsed the measure—underscores the ongoing partisan split over reproductive healthcare.
The Takeaway
This resolution reflects the broader debate over abortion access and the role of Congress in shaping reproductive rights. Whether it passes or not, it signals the ongoing tension between lawmakers advocating for abortion rights and those seeking to restrict them.
Legislative Status: A concurrent resolution was introduced in the House and sent to two committees for review. The next step is for these committees to discuss and vote on the resolution.
Links: HTML
Rep. Rudy Yakym (R-IN-2) introduced bill H.R. 2022 to reliquidate entries of golf cart tires due to prior liquidation outside the timeframe allowed under the Tariff Act of 1930.
Summary:
A Swing for Fairness in Golf Cart Tariffs...
In a move that could resonate across the golfing community and beyond, Rep. Rudy Yakym (R-IN-2) has teed up a new bill aimed at leveling the playing field for importers of golf cart tires. The proposal, H.R. 2022, seeks to reliquidate entries of K389 Hole-N-One golf cart tires due to prior liquidation outside the timeframe allowed under the Tariff Act of 1930.
Why It Matters
The bill’s focus stems from earlier rulings by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which classified these tires as free under specific harmonized tariff schedule rules. The move could provide relief to importers who may have faced unexpected duties due to the initial misclassification. However, the lack of bipartisan support so far—no Democrats, Independents, or even Republicans have co-sponsored the bill—raises questions about its viability in a divided Congress.
The Takeaway
While the golf cart tire issue may seem niche, it highlights the complexities of U.S. tariff laws and the ongoing challenges importers face in navigating the system. If passed, the bill could set a precedent for similar disputes in other industries. For now, it’s a reminder that even the smallest details in trade policy can have big implications.
Legislative Status: A bill (HR) was introduced in the House and sent to the Committee on Ways and Means for review. Next, the committee will discuss and review the bill.
Links: HTML
Rep. Craig Goldman (R-TX) introduced H.J. Res. 75 to disapprove a rule setting energy conservation standards for commercial refrigerators and freezers
Summary:
A Chill in Congress: Lawmakers Take Aim at Energy Efficiency Standards In a move that’s heating up debates over regulatory oversight, Rep. Craig Goldman (R-TX) has introduced a resolution that could have a big impact on energy policy. Here’s what you need to know: Rep. Goldman’s H.J. Res. 75 is taking direct aim at a Department of Energy rule that sets energy conservation standards for commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers. The resolution would allow Congress to disapprove the rule, potentially rolling back the energy efficiency requirements for these appliances. This isn’t just about refrigerators—it’s part of a larger tug-of-war between lawmakers and regulators over who gets to set the rules for energy efficiency. While the Department of Energy says these standards are crucial for reducing energy consumption, critics argue they could lead to higher costs for businesses. The Takeaway This resolution is a small but significant example of how political battles over energy policy are playing out in Washington. Whether it gains traction or not, it’s a reminder that even seemingly niche regulations can spark big debates.
Legislative Status: A proposed joint resolution was introduced in the House and sent to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce for review. The next step is for the committee to discuss and vote on the resolution.
Links: HTML
Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK-4) introduced bill H.R. 1968 to extend funding through September 30, 2025
Summary:
If Rep. Tom Cole’s New Bill Sets the Tone for 2025 Spending…
In a move that could signal a shift in how Washington approaches its finances, Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK-4) has introduced H.R. 1968, a bill designed to extend funding for various government departments and programs through September 30, 2025. This comprehensive legislation covers a wide array of sectors, from agriculture and commerce to defense and homeland security, reflecting the diverse needs of the nation. The bill not only continues funding for essential services but also introduces notable increases in specific areas. Healthcare, for instance, sees a boost with extended services for community health centers and the Medicare-dependent hospital program, alongside enhanced support for telehealth services. Additionally, the bill allocates $1.9 trillion in appropriations, while also rescinding previous funding allocations and implementing guidelines for whistleblower protection and cybersecurity measures. This move by Rep. Cole could set a precedent for how future funding decisions are made, especially as the country approaches 2025. The bill's focus on both maintaining current programs and investing in emerging areas like telehealth suggests a strategic approach to resource allocation.
The Takeaway:
Comprehensive Coverage: The bill extends funding across multiple government departments and programs.
Healthcare Boost: Increased funding for community health centers and telehealth services.
Financial Realignment: $1.9 trillion in appropriations with selected fund rescissions.
Protections Enhanced: New guidelines for whistleblower protection and cybersecurity.
This legislation could be a bellwether for future fiscal policies, indicating a balanced approach between maintaining essential services and innovating for tomorrow's challenges.
Legislative Status: A bill (HR) was introduced in the House and sent to two committees (Appropriations and the Budget) for review. Next, the committees will discuss and review the bill.
Links: HTML
have a splendid day,
watchdog team